Navigating Therapeutic Approaches: Care Model vs. Feedback Informed Therapy (FIT)

It is estimated that there are about 500 different labels for the various psychotherapies that are practiced. The most familiar are Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT), psychodynamic therapy, and group and family counseling. You may also know of Interpersonal Therapy, EMDR, DBT, ERP, ACT, and so on. My sense is that all of these therapies can be helpful (or possibly harmful?) with the right therapist and the right patient (“client” or “consumer” if you prefer that terminology).

The one big elephant in the treatment room is named Trust. None of these therapies will accomplish very much unless the patient trusts the therapist. As a shortcut to figuring out whether I have the right therapist for myself, I might wonder if I feel free to question the therapist, disagree with them, or ask for a change of direction. Would my therapist be okay with my expressing a different opinion? That would be an example of trust.

These comments about trust apply also to a doctor prescribing medicine or doing surgery. The outcome is likely to be better. The reasons and causes of better outcomes are also connected with placebo and nocebo responses.

The ability to develop a trusting alliance should be thought of as a skill set that therapists can develop. Two different methodologies stand out as I read the literature:

• The Care Model
• Dr. Scott Miller’s Feedback Informed Therapy (FIT) incorporates the concept of “deliberate practice.”

While both models aim to improve therapeutic processes and outcomes, they approach these goals from different angles. Let’s explore the similarities and differences between these two approaches, shedding light on how they can complement each other in clinical practice.

Understanding the Care Model

The Care Model is an approach that emphasizes the therapeutic relationship and the personal care provided to clients. It focuses on creating a safe, supportive, and empathetic environment where clients can openly share their thoughts and feelings. CARE (Connect, Acknowledge, Respond, Evaluate) is grounded in the belief that a solid client-therapist relationship is the foundation for effective therapy. It prioritizes understanding the client’s perspective, fostering emotional safety, and tailoring the therapeutic approach to meet the unique needs of each individual.

Key components of the Care model include:

• Empathy and active listening
• Building trust and rapport
• Individualized care plans
• Emotional support and validation

 

Exploring Feedback Informed Therapy (FIT)

Feedback-Informed Therapy (FIT), developed by Dr. Scott Miller, takes a slightly different approach. FIT is an evidence-based practice that systematically incorporates client feedback into the therapeutic process. FIT aims to enhance treatment effectiveness by adjusting methods based on real-time feedback from clients regarding their experience of the therapy session and perceived progress.

FIT involves two primary tools:

1. Session Rating Scale (SRS): This scale measures the client’s perception of the therapeutic relationship, including factors like empathy, collaboration, and understanding.
2. Outcome Rating Scale (ORS): This scale assesses the client’s well-being across multiple dimensions, such as individual functioning, interpersonal relationships, social roles, and overall mental health.

Additionally, FIT emphasizes the concept of “deliberate practice,” where therapists continually refine their skills by focusing on areas needing improvement, as identified through client feedback and outcome measures. This approach fosters a culture of openness, learning, and adaptation, with the aim of constantly improving therapeutic efficacy.

 

Similarities between the Care Model and FIT

At their core, both the Care model and FIT are deeply committed to enhancing the quality of the therapeutic relationship and ensuring that therapy is client-centered. They recognize the importance of understanding the client’s perspective and adapting the therapeutic approach to meet each client’s unique needs. Both models advocate for a personalized approach to therapy, rather than a one-size-fits-all solution.

 

Differences between the Care Model and FIT

While emphasizing the therapeutic relationship is a common theme in the Care model and FIT, their methodologies and tools for achieving goals diverge.

• Methodology: The Care model primarily focuses on the qualitative aspects of the therapeutic relationship, such as empathy, emotional support, and understanding, without systematic measurement. In contrast, FIT incorporates quantitative measures (SRS and ORS) to gather systematic feedback from clients, aiming to evaluate and adjust the therapy process empirically.
• Feedback Mechanism: The Care model relies on the therapist’s sensitivity and intuition to gauge client needs and adjust care accordingly. FIT, however, uses structured feedback mechanisms to explicitly solicit the client’s views on the therapy session and outcomes, making adjustments based on this data.
• Focus on Improvement: While both models value therapist improvement, FIT explicitly incorporates the concept of “deliberate practice,” encouraging therapists to use feedback and outcome data to identify specific areas for professional development and skill enhancement.

 

Integrating the Care Model with FIT

Integrating the Care model’s emphasis on empathy and individualized care with FIT’s systematic feedback and deliberate practice could provide a comprehensive approach that maximizes therapeutic effectiveness. Such integration could combine both models’ strengths—leveraging the Care model’s qualitative depth with the empirical, feedback-driven approach of FIT. This hybrid model could enable therapists to build strong, empathetic relationships with their clients while using structured feedback to adapt and refine their therapeutic practices.

 

Conclusion

The Care model and Feedback Informed Therapy (FIT) each offer valuable perspectives on improving therapeutic processes and outcomes. While they differ in methodology and emphasis, both models are committed to client-centered care and the importance of the therapeutic relationship. By exploring the similarities and differences between these approaches, therapists can gain insights into how they might integrate these models into their practice, fostering an environment of continual learning, adaptation, and client-focused care. Whether through the empathetic foundations of the Care model or the empirical rigor of FIT, therapists are equipped with diverse tools to meet the varying needs of their clients, steering them toward healing and growth.

If you would like to learn more about these models, or would like to become a patient, please Contact Us.